GitHub Forensic Analysis vs Houzez: What $83,000 Actually Bought
A forensic examination of 1,614 GitHub commits reveals what really happened to the $83,000 USD paid to Waqas Riaz, creator of the Houzez WordPress theme.
The Commits Don't Lie. The Evidence Is Permanent.
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Payment | $83,000 USD (~$113,700 CAD) |
| Payments Made | 13 months |
| Project Duration | 14 months |
| Total Commits | 1,614 |
| First Payment | October 2024 |
| First Commit | November 19, 2024 |
| Waqas Riaz's Contribution | ~6% of commits |
| Project Status | Never deployed |
$83,000 was paid to Waqas Riaz, the creator of ThemeForest's #1 real estate WordPress theme, known as Houzez. Waqas contributed approximately 6% of the code. His employees did the rest. The project was never finished, never deployed, and never delivered.
This is my documented experience. The evidence is timestamped, preserved, and permanent. The website provided by Waqas Riaz, Houzez Theme Developer is
https://dev.espmarketplace.com/.
Some design updates are still pending completion. I want to be completely fair to Waqas, but this is basically the product I have after 83,000 USD in payments and roughly 14 months of development. If anyone wants a copy of the PRD please email me at hello@ESPMarketplace.com.
The Lie That Hid Everything
"GitHub Is Unsafe"
Six months before I finally gained access to my project's code, I asked Waqas to upload my website, ESP Marketplace, to GitHub so that I could track its progress.
Waqas's response: He refused. He told me GitHub was "unsafe" because it "exposes the code" and "everyone can see it." He said someone could steal and duplicate my platform.
The reality: GitHub offers private repositories. Banks use them. Governments use them. Fortune 500 companies use them. Microsoft owns GitHub. Only invited collaborators can see private codes.
I believe he was not truthful to stop me from seeing what was actually happening with my money.

The Proof They Were Using Version Control All Along
When the repository was finally uploaded by the main developer, Shanijahania-Equal Pixels, to my GitHub account in December 2025, I discovered something revealing in the commit history:
Merge branch 'main' of 110.39.1.242:equalpixels/esp-directory
That IP address—110.39.1.242—is their internal Git server at equalpixels.
They were version-controlling my project the entire time. They maintained the project on their own server. I was never unable to view it.
When Waqas finally instructed the team to upload the repository on my firm demand, all 1,614 commits were included, revealing over a year of development history that he had kept hidden from me, the person funding the project.
Who Actually Did the Work?
The Development Team Exposed
The commit history reveals exactly who wrote the code:
| Developer | Commits | Percentage | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| shanijahania | ~800+ | ~50% | Primary developer |
| MuhammadKhalil492 | ~500+ | ~31% | Secondary developer |
| Shoaib | ~150+ | ~9% | Developer |
| Waqas Riaz | ~100+ | ~6% | Project lead (allegedly) |
| Others | ~64+ | ~4% | Various contributors |
The Critical Finding
Waqas Riaz—the person I wired $83,000 to—contributed approximately 6% of the commits while collecting 100% of the money.
He told me he had "4 full-time developers" working on my project. He told me the money I was sending diligently "barely covered their costs." He told me he was "working for free" himself and not taking any money. I felt horrible.
The Github commits tell a very different story.
Review the Complete Houzez Team GitHub Timeline.
Who Is shanijahania?
The developer responsible for 50% of my project's code has a public GitHub profile. Here is what it reveals:
| Profile Field | Information |
|---|---|
| Full Name | Shahnawaz Jahania |
| GitHub Username | shanijahania |
| Employer | equalpixels.io |
| shanijahania@gmail.com | |
| Website | equalpixels.in |
| Location | Lahore, Pakistan |
| Followers | 2 |
| Following | 2 |
The Connection
Do you remember the internal Git server mentioned in the commit history?
110.39.1.242:equalpixels/esp-directory
Shahnawaz Jahania works for EqualPixels.io; The same organization was responsible for running the server that concealed my code.
This worker was not a freelancer hired specifically for my project, which was never supposed to happen. This individual seems to be an employee of Waqas—someone who works on Houzez but is also an owner of Equalpixels projects—who was temporarily assigned to my platform while I paid $6,240 per month.
The Smoking Gun—Where Did Shahnawaz Jahania Go?
The Timeline After I Stopped Paying
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| November 10, 2025 | My final payment |
| November 10, 2025 | I put the project on hold |
| December 24, 2025 | shanijahania creates new repository: hcrm-houzez |
| December 2025 | 10 commits to the new Houzez CRM project |
What Is hcrm-houzez?
Six weeks after my payments stopped, shanijahania created a new public repository called hcrm-houzez—a CRM system for Houzez.
The developer who wrote 50% of my project's code went straight back to building products for Waqas the moment my money stopped flowing.
In my opinion, this confirms what I suspected: my $83,000 was subsidizing Waqas's payroll. His employees worked on my project while I paid, then returned to Houzez products when I stopped.

The Quality Comparison—Two Standards of Work
This is where the evidence becomes undeniable.
I analyzed the code shanijahania wrote for my $83,000 project versus the code he wrote for Houzez immediately after my payments ended.
Review the Complete Houzez Team GitHub Timeline.
Code Quality: ESP Marketplace (My Project)
What I Paid: $83,000 USD over 13 months
| Quality Metric | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Commit Messages | "no message", "fixed issue", "update", vague descriptions |
| Spelling in Code | Typos throughout: "udpate", "chagne", "wiht", "relateion" |
| Documentation | Minimal to none |
| Code Organization | Scattered, inconsistent structure |
| Merge Conflicts | Frequent, suggesting poor coordination |
| Code Reverts | Multiple instances of broken code being reverted |
| Project Duration | 14 months |
| Final Status | Never deployed to production |
Sample Commit Messages From My Project:
| Date | Author | Commit Message |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2024 | Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
| Nov 22, 2024 | Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
| Dec 5, 2024 | Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
| Dec 7, 2024 | Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
45+ commits with literally "no message"—no documentation of what was changed or why.
Code Quality: hcrm-houzez (Waqas's Houzez Product)
What I Paid: $0 (this was after my payments stopped)
| Quality Metric | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Commit Messages | Proper, descriptive messages |
| Code Structure | Clean Laravel architecture |
| Database Schema | Complete, well-designed migrations |
| Models | Properly structured with relationships |
| Controllers | Full CRUD operations |
| Organization | Professional, production-ready |
| Project Duration | Functional foundation in approximately 1 week |
| Final Status | Working CRM system |
What One Week of Houzez Development Included in Comparison:
Looking at the hcrm-houzez repository created December 24, 2025:
| Component | Status |
|---|---|
| Complete database migrations | ✅ Built |
| Multiple Eloquent models with relationships | ✅ Built |
| Controllers with full CRUD operations | ✅ Built |
| Proper Laravel file structure | ✅ Built |
| Authentication scaffolding | ✅ Built |
| Clean, organized, documented code | ✅ Built |
The Comparison: Side by Side
| Aspect | My Project ($83,000) | Houzez CRM ($0 from me) |
|---|---|---|
| Commit Quality | "no message" × 45+ | Proper descriptions |
| Code Spelling | "udpate", "chagne" | Professional |
| Time to Foundation | 14 months, incomplete | ~1 week, functional |
| Documentation | Almost none | Organized |
| Architecture | Scattered | Clean Laravel |
| Deployment | Never | Production-ready |
| Priority Level | Low (client project) | High (boss's product) |
What This Proves
| Finding | Implication |
|---|---|
| shanijahania CAN produce quality work | He chose not to for my project |
| Fast development IS possible | 14 months of delays appears intentional |
| Houzez gets his best effort | I got his leftover effort |
| Two standards exist | Premium quality for Waqas, scraps for paying clients |
Same developer. Same skillset. The developer adheres to two distinct quality standards.
When working for Waqas, Shahnawaz Jahania produces clean, professional, well-documented code in days.
Shahnawaz Jahania produced poor, undocumented, and typo-filled work over a period of 14 months on my project, for which I paid $83,000 USD.
The Financial Manipulation
Waqas says, "I'm Working for Free"
Waqas told me repeatedly that he wasn't taking any money for himself from the project. He said the $6,240 monthly payments "barely covered" his developers' costs because they were "the best and trained by him," and "he claimed he paid them much higher than regular Pakistani developers earn."
Waqas even said, his Pakistani developers were asking him why he was spending so much time on my project "for such a small amount of money each month."
He made me feel guilty. For paying him USD $83,000.
The Houzez's Waqas Riaz Reality
| His Claim | The Evidence |
|---|---|
| "Working for free" | Contributed only 6% of commits |
| "4 full-time developers" | His existing Houzez employees |
| "Barely covering costs" | $83,000 USD = ~23 million Pakistani rupees |
| "They ask why so much work for so little" | Developer returned to Houzez immediately when payments stopped |
I Asked Waqas for Documentation—Three Times
Over the course of the project, I requested:
- Payment invoices—for my accounting records
- Payroll hours—to understand where money was going
- Expense breakdown—how funds were being allocated
He refused. Every time.
Waqas's explanation? "This is an in-house project. I treat this like my project. We don't worry about records like that."
In-house? I was paying $83,000. It was MY project. I was entitled to every receipt, every invoice, and every hour logged.
But he treated my money like his money. He assured me that there was no need to worry or ask questions.
Review the Complete Houzez Team GitHub Timeline.
The Complete Timeline
October 2024—First Payment, Zero Code
| Payment | Commits |
|---|---|
| $6,240 USD (~$8,550 CAD) | ZERO |
I made my first payment in October 2024. The GitHub repository shows no commits until November 19, 2024.
I paid for a month of nothing, except the PRD done with Waqas, which was done in a couple of days.

November 19, 2024 — The Project Actually Begins
| Author | Commit Message |
|---|---|
| shanijahania | "Set up a fresh Laravel app" |
| shanijahania | "Install Breeze" |
| shanijahania | "Initial commit" |
| shanijahania | "add packages, filament, seo, media" |
Note: It was Shanijahania, not Waqas, who initiated the entire project from the beginning.
November 20-21, 2024 — The Pattern Emerges
| Author | Commit Message |
|---|---|
| shanijahania | "create models" |
| Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
| Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
| Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
| Waqas Riaz | "no message" |
| shanijahania | "Fixed images issue in post" |
From day one, the pattern was established: shanijahania does substantive work with descriptions. Waqas contributes "no message" commits.

December 2024 — November 2025
Development continued with the same pattern:
- shanijahania and MuhammadKhalil492 doing the majority of actual coding
- Waqas contributing minimally with undocumented commits
- Frequent "no message" entries (45+ total)
- Typos throughout the codebase
- Multiple code reverts indicate broken functionality.
- Merger conflicts suggest poor team coordination.
Summer 2025 — I Tried to Stop
Midway through the project, I paused the payments for one month. I could see that only a small amount of work was being completed when Waqas was not on extended weekend vacations, and much of it was nonfunctional or broken. I felt deeply concerned; I was exhausted but could not sleep.
His response? He assured me everything was fine. Waqas said he wasn't angry with me for being upset.
Then Waqas said:
"Mother can do no wrong; you are like mother to me."
He didn't show me progress. He didn't offer GitHub access. He didn't explain where almost $70,000+ had already gone. However, Waqas would remind me that a payment was needed so he could pay for the development team.
He forgave me. I apologized for questioning him.
And I started paying again.
Waqas would remind me that a payment was needed so he could pay for the development team.
"I am not a rich man," Waqas would say. "I cannot afford to pay for developers; maybe it would be better if you paid on the 6th rather than the 10th of each month."
Even through Ramadan I would pay, when no work was done. There was never a break for me, just pay money.
November 10, 2025 — Final Payment
After 13 months of payments totaling $83,000, I finally stopped. The project was nowhere near complete. Core features had never been built. Nothing had been deployed.
I was exhausted. I had been working until 3 a.m. I was working until 3 a.m. on the platform to accommodate Pakistani time zones, sleeping for a couple of hours when possible, and then waking up to work another 12 hours managing my drilling and consulting operation. I had lost connections with people and life in general. I was so isolated, I began to fear for my life.
And I finally listened to the voice that had been telling me that something was terribly wrong with Waqas Riaz.
What Was Built vs. What Was Missing
Features With Some Work Done
| Module | Status |
|---|---|
| User registration/profiles | Partial |
| Blog/Posts | Partial |
| Classified ads | Partial |
| Jobs board | Partial |
| Lead forms | In progress |
| Admin dashboard | Partial |
| Frontend templates | Partial |
Features NEVER Built
| Module | Status |
|---|---|
| Payment processing | No commits found |
| Subscription billing | No commits found |
| Credit system | No commits found |
| Lead matching automation | No commits found |
| Email automation | No commits found |
| Production deployment | Never attempted |
After $83,000 and 14 months, I received a shell. Static pages without business logic. A car without an engine.
The Cost Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total paid | $83,000 USD |
| Total commits | 1,614 |
| Cost per commit | $51.42 |
| Waqas's commits | ~100 |
| Cost per Waqas commit | $830 |
What $83,000 Should Buy
At professional development rates ($50-150/hour), $83,000 should deliver:
- 550-1,660 hours of focused development
- A complete, functional, deployed platform
- Full documentation
- Testing and quality assurance
- Production deployment and support
What I Actually Received
- 14 months of delays and excuses
- 6% contribution from the person I paid
- Undocumented, typo-filled code
- Missing core business features
- Zero deployment
- No invoices or financial documentation
- Nothing usable
How Many Hours Were Actually Worked?
Based on my analysis of the 1,614 commits, I estimate that the actual development time is as follows. This is only an estimate; many developers will have a better understanding than I do.
| Commit Type | Est. Count | Time Each | Hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trivial ("no message", typos, tiny fixes) | ~300 | 10-15 min | ~60 |
| Moderate (basic features, updates) | ~900 | 30-45 min | ~500 |
| Substantial (new modules, complex work) | ~400 | 1-2 hrs | ~500 |
| Total Estimated Hours | ~1,000-1,100 |
However, the sloppy quality—reverts, merge conflicts, typos, and undocumented commits—indicates that a significant portion of this time was either unfocused or wasted.
My adjusted estimate: 600-800 hours of actual productive work.
The Math That Exposes the Lie
| Calculation | Amount |
|---|---|
| Estimated productive hours | 600-800 |
| Fair rate for senior Pakistani developers | $20-30/hour |
| Fair cost for work delivered | $14,000-21,000 |
| I paid | $83,000 |
| Unaccounted for | ~$60,000+ |
He told me the money "barely covered" his developers. He told me he was "working for free." Waqas told me that his developers asked him why he spent so much time on my project for such little money.
The commits tell a different story. In my opinion, approximately $60,000 of my money is unaccounted for.


Who Is Waqas Riaz?
His Public Image
| Credential | Verification |
|---|---|
| Creator of Houzez Theme | ThemeForest listing confirmed |
| #1 Real Estate WordPress Theme | ThemeForest ranking confirmed |
| 54,413+ sales | ThemeForest sales counter |
| $79 per license | ThemeForest pricing |
| Estimated Gross Revenue | $4.3+ million USD |
| Power Elite Author | ThemeForest badge (sold over $1 million) |
| 2,600+ five-star reviews | ThemeForest reviews |
| 10+ years on platform | ThemeForest author history |
What Waqas Told Me
| His Claim | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I'm from the village" | Multi-millionaire theme author |
| "I'm not a wealthy man" | $4.3+ million in theme sales alone |
| "I give money to help children go to school" | Made me feel guilty for questioning expenses |
| "I'm working for free on your project" | Contributed 6% of commits |
| "The money barely covers developer costs" | Refused to provide any documentation |
The Contrast
| Public Profile | My Experience |
|---|---|
| Power Elite Author | Took $83,000, contributed 6% |
| 54,000+ happy customers | Refused invoices three times |
| #1 real estate theme | Never deployed my project |
| Decade of success | I believe he was not truthful about GitHub being "unsafe" |
| Millions in revenue | Told me he was "not wealthy" |
The Evidence Chain
| Evidence | What It Demonstrates |
|---|---|
| October payment, November first commit | Payment collected before work began |
| Waqas = ~6% of commits | Minimal personal contribution |
| shanijahania = ~50% of commits | Employee did the actual work |
| 45+ "no message" commits | Unprofessional, undocumented development |
| 110.39.1.242:equalpixels server | Internal Git existed — GitHub "unsafe" claim was false |
| hcrm-houzez repo (Dec 24, 2025) | Developer immediately returned to Houzez |
| Quality comparison | Professional work for Houzez, sloppy work for me |
| Refused invoices (3 times) | No financial accountability |
| Never deployed | 14 months of payments, nothing in production |
The Real Waqas Riaz
He stands behind the Power Elite badge. Behind the 54,000 sales. Behind the #1 WordPress theme ranking. Behind the five-star reviews.
In my experience and opinion, this is a person who:
- Collects payment before work begins
- Has employees do the labor while collecting 100% of payment
- I believe he lied about GitHub to hide evidence from clients
- Delivers sloppy, undocumented work to paying clients
- Reserves quality work for his own products
- Refuses to provide basic financial documentation
- Uses emotional manipulation to prevent questioning
- Never finishes what he's paid to build
The commits are timestamped. The payments are documented. The evidence is permanent.
I am not asking you to take my word for it. I am showing you the evidence. Draw your own conclusions.
Reports Being Filed
This documentation and evidence will formally be submitted to:
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)—United States
- Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre—Canada
- Federal Investigation Agency (FIA)—Pakistan
- Envato/ThemeForest—Platform where Houzez is sold
- Payoneer—Payment processor used for transfers to Waqas Riaz
These authorities are now becoming aware of my experience and are receiving the supporting documentation.
Are You a Victim Too?
If you've had a similar experience with Waqas Riaz, Favethemes, equalpixels, or custom development work related to the Houzez theme, you are not alone.
I kept silent for months because I felt ashamed. I thought I was stupid for trusting someone with such impressive ThemeForest credentials. I blamed myself.
I'm not silent anymore.
If this happened to you, I want to hear from you. Your story matters. Together, our experiences form a pattern that cannot be ignored.
Contact me to share your story.
Conclusion
I paid $83,000 USD to the creator of Evato ThemeForest's most successful real estate WordPress theme. I placed my trust in his credentials. I trusted his Power Elite reputation. I trusted his promises. I just trusted.
What I received was:
- 6% of his personal effort
- His employees' leftover time between Houzez projects
- Undocumented, sloppy code filled with typos
- Excuses instead of invoices
- "Mother can do no wrong" instead of accountability
- A project that was never deployed
The GitHub commits are timestamped. They cannot be altered. They cannot be hidden. They tell the true story of what happened to my $83,000.
This is my documented experience. my evidence. This report is my warning to others.
NEVER DEPLOYED
He contributed ~6% of the code.
$6,240
Project on hold
hcrm-houzez
the developer who did 50% of my project
was building a Houzez CRM plugin.
Professional work for Houzez.
($83,000 paid)
(Dec 2025)
Professional documentation for Houzez.
I asked 3 times. The answer was always no.
I paid $83,000. I was not "in-house." I was a paying client.
that was never deployed
quality offshore development
In my opinion, approximately $60,000+ is unaccounted for.
I believe these were deliberate deceptions.
The payments are documented.
The evidence is permanent.
Forensic analysis completed: December 30, 2025 Repository analyzed: github.com/ESP-Marketplace/ESP-Platform Total commits examined: 1,614 Evidence preserved: 45+ screenshots.
Read the full story: Why the Houzez Theme Review?
All statements of opinion are clearly marked as such. All factual claims are supported by documentary evidence, including GitHub commit histories, payment records, and screenshots. This is based on my personal experience and documented evidence. Readers are encouraged to examine the evidence and draw their own conclusions.
